Business. In 2008, to obtain a campaign loan, the current Minister of Labor would have reduced his income.
Eric Woerth is angry with the numbers. If it’s a passing omission, it’s just embarrassing for the former budget minister and treasurer of the UMP; if the omission is voluntary, the problem is quite different.
Yesterday, the site Mediapart exhumed the request for a bank loan of the candidate for re-election at the town hall of Chantilly (Oise)- Freeandopenisland payday loan online California. In early 2008, Woerth wants to borrow 6,500 euros over eight months from Credit Agricole, for the purposes of his campaign. The classic request, easily executable, because any candidate having obtained more than 5% of the votes can be reimbursed for his campaign expenses. Mayor out of Chantilly, Woerth is sure of his shot. But can not help but skew.
In his loan application, he declares 3,000 euros of monthly income. Yet he is a minister (14,000 euros gross per month) and mayor (2,400 euros). “This is a loan related to municipal elections, so it is […] consistent,” yesterday justified his entourage with AFP. It would be “consistent” to declare only his allowances mayor for a municipal campaign loan – notwithstanding a differential between 3,000 and 2,400 euros, a straw for an elected.
Coming to the rescue of power, Crédit Agricole Brie Picardie does not see either malice. This loan is “backed by the State’s repayment guarantee and not by the candidate’s income”. In short, it would be a “common cash advance”. Is. But taking into account the various loans of Woerth, Credit Agricole would have calculated, from his statement, that the latter had “112 euros per month to live”, and presented a “bank debt of 89%,” according to Mediapart. With such a rate, any lambda borrower would be restocked by his bank.
For any answer, Crédit Agricole “gives a formal denial to all allegations or interpretations […] drawn from a purely provisional and non-contractual working document”, and threatens to file a complaint about disclosure of internal documents covered by banking secrecy.
This is not the first time that Woerth has a local income problem. In 1992, the regional chamber of accounts denounced his treatment as director of the Agency Development Oise – ADO, an outgrowth of the General Council: “After two increases of 25.7 and 18.9% occurred in 1987 and 1989, Eric Woerth’s monthly gross salary was increased from 3,600 to 5,300 euros. ” Plus bonuses and a company car, ” granted without rigor ” by the department.
Already, the irremovable treasurer of the RPR and the UMP mixed caps, participating in January 1988 to a fundraising dinner of the presidential campaign of Jacques Chirac, on behalf of the General Council of the Oise. An expenditure of 5,600 euros “totally foreign to the missions of the Agency”. After admonitions from the Court of Auditors, the ADO will have to repay the sum to the General Council. Woerth will pay only half of the legal fees incurred by the community following his ineligibility, temporarily pronounced in 1990. Not to mention the 19% of the budget of the ADO devoted to the castle of Chantilly, his future electoral stronghold.
Yesterday, his entourage denounced “relentlessness” against the minister, “the absurdity” of the last banking suspicion about him: “The freedom of the press is not the freedom to insinuate.” But if Eric Woerth was sometimes content to be a minister, only a minister?